Exposure’s DAM tools, which are not catalog based, are probably better than C1’s, and its Color editing is just as good. Exposure X6 is really excellent, and closely rivals C1 and Lr. Otherwise I still find it clunky and too wrapped up in jargon. DxO PL4 is indeed good, but in my opinion mostly for Deep Prime and Viewpoint. I do keep an eye on other options though. I’ll never forgive them for killing MediaPro, and the pricing is extreme, but C1 is still the best tool. And its stable, with a catalog of 80’000+ photos. For my tastes, C1 allows me to get the look I want from Raw much faster and much more reliably than any other tool. In any case the (for me) killer feature of Luma curves was a strong temptation, and the Colour Editor is also superb. I had maintained C1 licensing all the while, and have now switched to C1 21. That was the final straw for me (note, they still haven’t fixed it. When Adobe released 10.1, they made things even worse, despite the fact they had clear warnings and evidence from Beta testers. I don’t believe C1 had ever accomplished that. I stayed there right up until Lr 10, which is an abysmal disaster, pretty much unusable on my and my other people’s setups, to the remarkable extent of freezing MacOS to the point it needs a power cycle. But I fiund it quite frustrating, and eventually moved to Lr CC. On the demise of Aperture, I moved back to C1 probably v7 or 8. Soon after when Aperture 2 appeared, with a lower price and much less demand on resources, I switched to that, and stayed with it to the bitter end. Tempted by a fully integrated workflow, I bought Lightroom 1 when it came out. The first generic Raw developer I bought was C1 3.7, which ironically I used together with Media Pro. #Alternate mac app neofinder softwareI’ve been going around the loop of DAM and Raw development software forever. I'm curious if there are any other suggestions. Otherwise, I would think about connecting with Capture One and DxO, as it provides an incredibly good management. Good RAW developers like Capture One and DxO are very well integrated. It is especially useful for very large image catalogs with sophisticated IPTC editing. #Alternate mac app neofinder plusThe only program that has an equally good catalog and RAW management is Adobe Lightroom, but there probably many users do not want to go back again.Īt the moment I am testing Photo Mechanics Plus with an excellent catalog management. It is extremely fast, but unfortunately has limited functionality offline. A big disadvantage of DxO is the poor catalog management. I always use both programs alternately depending on my needs. Partially even better for example in noise reduction. I find DxO Photolab quite equivalent to Capture One. I find Capture One one of the best raw developers but the behavior of the company suggests that I should look for an alternative in the foreseeable future. #Alternate mac app neofinder updateWith the CO21 update which has angered many users and the new price increase, many users will probably think about an alternative. (However I and a great fan of Affinity, but as a complement to Capture One, not as a replacement.) I'm afraid that whenever I try other apps out of curiosity, it is Capture One that I compare them to, and generally they fall short. I've been using Capture One for some years, since version 4.1 if I remember correctly. I'm not sure what you mean by "providing you use the right format". (Not so if you end up taking the image on to do more work in Photoshop or Affinity, for instance, but you wouldn't always need to do that, perhaps?) On the other hand with Capture One, the extra space taken up by storage of edits and previews is much more modest. afphoto files for every picture is as much as double the space need for the raw alone. afphoto file which can grow to be quite large, so there is a considerable storage issue if the space needed for your raws plus your. Its "develop" persona, though, is in my opinion much more rudimentary than camera raw in Photoshop, and I think that you would be seriously disappointed in trying to use it for developing raw files, compared with Capture One.Īnother downside is that when you work on a raw file in Affinity it will create an. Affinity is a realistic alternative to Photoshop, for instance for retouching, panorama stitching, etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |